One Story, Four Lenses: How Media Framing Shapes Our View of America, AI, and Global Power
One Story, Four Lenses:
How Media Framing Shapes Our View of America, AI, and Global Power
By William B. Ready
It started with a morning email.
Like many of you, I scan headlines before I finish my first cup of coffee. One of my go-to sources is the Wall Street Journal’s “Top Stories” briefing — a quick-hit summary of what’s supposedly most important in the world. From the lead article today, One line stood out:
“China is quickly eroding America’s lead in the global AI race.”
That sentence and a few words into the summary, made me pause. Maybe it was the framing — the use of the word eroding, the immediate implication of loss or "losing." Maybe it was the subtle tension behind the idea that America’s dominance in AI, something we often take for granted, might be slipping away.
The tone was clear: America is losing ground, China is gaining it, and we should be worried. But the more I looked at it, the more I began to wonder—not just what the summary said, but how it was written. And more importantly: How else might this same news be told?
Whatever it was, I kept thinking about it. Was it true? Sure, maybe. But was it the only way to tell that story? I can frame my viewpoint, a Fiscal Conservative, Social Moderate, Less Government, and More Free-Thinking, Debate, and common sense. And, idealistically I wondered, how would others write this story, told from their viewpoints.
I decided to dig deeper — and to do it with AI.
As someone who works across both business strategy. board governance, and photography (yes, multiple world views that demand vision), I’ve been using ChatGPT as a creative partner. This time, I gave it a different challenge: to rewrite the same short article summary from a range of ideological and journalistic perspectives. Not just reworded — re-framed.
Here’s what I learned when I asked AI to show me how differently the same news could be told, depending on who’s holding the pen.
The Original Summary (Wall Street Journal)
This was the full summary that triggered my curiosity:
“China is quickly eroding America’s lead in the global AI race. OpenAI’s ChatGPT remains the world’s predominant AI consumer chatbot, and American AI is widely seen as the industry’s gold standard. But as in many other industries, Chinese companies have started to snatch customers by offering performance that is nearly as good at vastly lower prices. In Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia, users ranging from multinational banks to public universities are turning to large language models from Chinese companies. Saudi Aramco, the world’s largest oil company, recently installed DeepSeek in its main data center.”
At first glance, it’s a tidy update. But it leads with a sense of decline, frames Chinese gains as aggressive ("snatch customers"), and fails to note any broader context or resilience in the U.S. system.
So I got curious. What if I had written that same news blurb from a different lens? Or more precisely: what if different public figures or institutions had written it, with their own worldview baked in? So the four Versions below represent unaltered responses to my prompts. I left them unaltered to not impact their content from the prompts I gave.
I loaded in the title and summary from the email. I then gave it the prompt and posted the results below.
Version 1: A Fiscally Conservative, Socially Moderate Viewpoint
More of my viewpoint, (Hopefully)
AI Prompt: “Rephrase the summary from the viewpoint of a Fiscal Conservative, Social Moderate with a strong appreciation for American values and national pride.”
I started here because I wanted a more patriotic framing — one that might come from a moderate Republican or a centrist business leader. Someone who values national strength, market competition, and is wary of global overreach.
The United States continues to lead in AI, with platforms like ChatGPT setting the benchmark for the world. But as in many sectors, China is closing the gap with state-backed investment and aggressive pricing. Some institutions abroad are choosing Chinese models for cost—not quality.
Still, America's strength lies in free enterprise, ingenuity, and open competition. Unlike top-down regimes, our decentralized system thrives under pressure. Our innovation comes not from political dictates, but from a culture of creativity, private investment, and relentless adaptability. 🇺🇸
This version turns concern into resolve and something that is more positive, affirmative. It doesn’t ignore China’s rise — it just puts more balance into competitive aspects of global markets. ChatGPT seems to think it also imparts more trust in America’s ability to respond in this version.
Version 2: Jake Tapper–Style CNN Journalism 🧠
AI Prompt: “Now let’s shift this to how a CNN journalist like Jake Tapper would write it—leaning into urgency, tension, and accountability.”
Next, I wanted to see how a mainstream journalist might deliver this story — someone like Jake Tapper, who tends to lead with the tension, highlight contradictions, and challenge power structures on all sides.
AI Response 2:
China’s AI Models Are Gaining Ground. Is the U.S. Falling Asleep at the Wheel?Across the globe, institutions are adopting Chinese AI models that cost less and deliver just enough. From Saudi Aramco to public universities, Chinese tools are moving into spaces once dominated by U.S. firms.
Meanwhile, America’s top AI companies are focused on monetization, closed ecosystems, and enterprise deals. With no clear national AI policy and minimal public oversight, the U.S. risks losing not only market share—but also global influence over the future of data, privacy, and information.
The race is on. And despite our head start, the U.S. may already be standing still. 🇺🇸
This is also what ChatGPT wrote to summarize this Response. This version doesn’t declare panic, but it invites urgency. The tone is serious, probing, and unsparing — exactly the kind of framing that primes readers to question not just what’s happening, but what’s not.
My assessment is that the mainstream media does not look and think so globally. But like this response, the media play into global world view where we/ Americans, or anyone should not stand up to lead. There are no world leaders in this view.. just the people.. who need help from their governments and communities. Again, just my view.
Version 3: A Progressive Democratic Perspective ✊
AI Prompt: “What would this look like from the perspective of a progressive Democratic leader—like AOC, Bernie Sanders, or Jasmine Crockett?”
Then I asked for a rewrite from the lens of a progressive. [The kind of voice that cares deeply about access, equity, and accountability — not just American supremacy. ] I did not write this last sentance, which is where I depart from ChatGPT's bias.
AI Response 3:
America’s AI Leadership Should Serve the People—Not Just CorporationsWhile U.S. tech giants tout innovation, their tools are increasingly locked behind paywalls and proprietary gates. Meanwhile, Chinese AI firms are offering access at lower cost—and gaining ground worldwide, especially in underserved regions.
The problem isn’t just China. It’s our own system—where billion-dollar firms benefit from public infrastructure but give little back.
We need a people-first AI strategy: publicly funded models, fair labor practices, and open systems. Let’s lead with values, not just valuations. 🇺🇸
ChatGPT Reaction: That This version doesn’t deny that America is good at AI. It just asks: good for whom?
My Reaction: I would have expected more about Oligarch and the wealthy directing commerce away from the people who "need it the most, who we claim to represent and can offer the help to" I would have expected more about the Rich Elite driving businesses that fail to meet people's basic needs and that China is dancing all over us.
Version 4: Objective U.S.-Based Journalism 🎯
AI Prompt: “Now rephrase it in a neutral, U.S.-based but objective journalistic tone that doesn’t favor decline or triumph.”
Finally, I asked ChatGPT to write like a balanced, fact-based reporter. No spin. Just context.
China’s government-supported AI platforms are becoming more competitive—and in many parts of the world, more widely adopted. Cost and speed are driving adoption across the Middle East, Africa, and Asia.
American AI continues to lead in sophistication, but its commercialization model may be limiting its reach. Without a coordinated national strategy, the U.S. risks ceding influence not because of inferior technology, but because of access, pricing, and global alignment. 🌍
Chat GPT Summary: This version feels closest to what I wanted to read in that morning email. Its closer to what I would think objective, fact based, commons sense reporting should be. Not a warning or negative view. Not a boast. Just an informed explanation.
My Summary: This does not reflect a more common, perhaps business sense that competition is good, but that the models laid out in China may be developed with ethics that differ than US companies with IP that has been copied from others to close gaps in innovation.
Version 4: Objective My Version 🎯
What I Learned 📚
This exercise wasn’t just about rewriting a headline. It was about waking up to the framing. Every story we absorb — from The Journal to Substack to our social media feeds — is shaped by a lens. And over time, that lens shapes becomes our worldview.
Some quick takeaways:
-
Headlines trigger emotions: fear, pride, confidence, defensiveness.
-
Media framing reinforces beliefs — whether of decline, dominance, or disruption.
-
Exposure to just one kind of voice limits our understanding and narrows our empathy.
-
The stories we hear shape how we act, vote, think, and invest.
CHANGE YOUR LENSES! Look to a variety of sources to see more balance.
Final Thoughts 💬
This is about understanding more about what you are reading (or watching or listening) and who is writing or researching the material. What is their angle of approach and their style. Are they progressive or conservative, are they religious or agnostic, are they global or proud of their people, are they optimistic or patriotic or pessimistic or loath their community? Their words will shape YOUR VIEW.
This affects everyone over time. This is about how a small, subtle shift in tone — repeated over weeks, months, and years — can change the way we see ourselves and the world. Our optimism. Our skepticism. Our trust.
As a writer, strategist, and observer of culture, I plan to keep experimenting with how we frame the world around us. Because storytelling isn’t just how we explain the present.
It’s how we shape the future.
Thanks for reading.
— William B. Ready